Law:48RZ5 The Nobody Feels Like Writing Acts Just to Fix Typos Act: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|Dlaw3= | |Dlaw3= | ||
}} | }} | ||
WHEREAS There is currently no way to change a bill after it has been clarked, and | |||
WHEREAS This is perfectly fine for the most part, except for when there are grammar/formatting errors in the bill which nobody notices until it has been clarked, and | |||
WHEREAS This necessitates either the creation of another bill just to fix that error, or rejecting an otherwise fine bill, and | |||
WHEREAS That seems ridiculous | |||
THEREFORE Subsubsection C.1.2.3 is added to el Lexhatx which reads: | |||
C.1.2.3 If the Scribe finds an error in the formatting, grammar, or spelling of a bill that has already been clarked, or alerted of same, he shall work with the sponsor of the bill to fix said error(s). | |||
C.1.2.3.1 The Scribe shall publicize any proposed changes to a bill, and said changes may only be implemented after they have been public for seven days | |||
C.1.2.3.2 If, before the proposed changes are implemented, a petition of MCs representing at least 1/3 of the seats in the Cosa, or a petition of at least 1/3 of the Senators, goes before the Scribe in protest of the proposed changes to the bill, the Scribe may not implement the changes. | |||
C.1.2.3.3 If a disagreement arises over the interpretation of a law that was amended though this process, the language originally enacted by the Ziu is superior and shall be used in interpretation | |||
C.1.2.3.4 The Scribe shall keep a record of the original language of bills that were amended in this way for use according to C.1.2.3.3 | |||
Uréu q'estadra så: Ian Plätschisch - (MC-MRPT) |