Law:46RZ9 NOLITE REFORMARE IN PEIVS Act (NoRip): Difference between revisions

From TalossaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "WHEREAS the process of appeals is a way for plaintiff and accused to protect themselves of unjust trials; and, WHEREAS we want not to infringe upon this right to appeal, or t...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LawZiuStatus
|number=46RZ9
|lexhtitle={{TG}}
|status=Lex
|ziu=46th
|clark=3rd (April {{year|2014}})
|sponsor=[[Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun]]
|cosa= {{passed}}
|cyes= 130
|cno= 40
|cabs= 10
|senats= {{passed}}
|syes= 4
|sno= 3
|sabs= 1
}}
WHEREAS the process of appeals is a way for plaintiff and accused to protect themselves of unjust trials; and,
WHEREAS the process of appeals is a way for plaintiff and accused to protect themselves of unjust trials; and,


Line 8: Line 24:


4.3. Under the principle of reformatio in peius, the worsening change of a verdict, no appellate court shall be allowed to change an appealed ruling in such a manner that would be disadvantageous to the petitioner.
4.3. Under the principle of reformatio in peius, the worsening change of a verdict, no appellate court shall be allowed to change an appealed ruling in such a manner that would be disadvantageous to the petitioner.
4.3.1. In civil actions, appeals may be ruled in a detrimental manner to the appellant (reformationes in peius) only when both parties submit appeals.
4.3.1. In civil actions, appeals may be ruled in a detrimental manner to the appellant (reformationes in peius) only when both parties submit appeals.
4.3.2. In criminal procedures, reformationes in peius are forbidden whenever the appeal is lodged by the convict or in favour of the convict. In case of appeals from both parties, reformationes in peius detrimental to the convict shall be forbidden.
4.3.2. In criminal procedures, reformationes in peius are forbidden whenever the appeal is lodged by the convict or in favour of the convict. In case of appeals from both parties, reformationes in peius detrimental to the convict shall be forbidden.


Line 14: Line 32:
Uréu q'estadra så:
Uréu q'estadra så:
Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun - (Attorney-General)
Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun - (Attorney-General)
{{ScribeAuth}}

Latest revision as of 10:40, 12 April 2023

46RZ9

Amends.png
EPHEMERAL STATUS

LEGEU

It amends the following:
LexhatxG)
Ziu 46th Clark 3rd (April 2014/XXXV)
Uréu q'estadra så: Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun

Cosa.png Cosă: PASSED
Per 130 — Con 40 — Aus 10

Senats.png Senäts: PASSED
Per 4 — Con 3 — Aus 1

L'Anuntziă dels Legeux

View Clark Result

WHEREAS the process of appeals is a way for plaintiff and accused to protect themselves of unjust trials; and,

WHEREAS we want not to infringe upon this right to appeal, or to strike fear that the result might be worse when appealed; now,

THEREFORE know all citaxhiens by these present, that Title G, Section 4 of the Lexhatx shall be changed as follows:

A new subsection 4.3. shall be created after G.4.2., reading:

4.3. Under the principle of reformatio in peius, the worsening change of a verdict, no appellate court shall be allowed to change an appealed ruling in such a manner that would be disadvantageous to the petitioner.

4.3.1. In civil actions, appeals may be ruled in a detrimental manner to the appellant (reformationes in peius) only when both parties submit appeals.

4.3.2. In criminal procedures, reformationes in peius are forbidden whenever the appeal is lodged by the convict or in favour of the convict. In case of appeals from both parties, reformationes in peius detrimental to the convict shall be forbidden.


Uréu q'estadra så: Magniloqueu Épiqeu da Lhiun - (Attorney-General)


ScriberyBadge.png This page is maintained under authority of the Scribery of Abbavilla.
Această páxhină isch sub l'auþorità dal Scriuerïă d'Abbavilla.