Law:The Multiple Office Prohibition Act: Difference between revisions

From TalossaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "==23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act== '''WHEREAS''' Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and '''WHEREAS''' the Justices can't make fair decisio...")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act==
===23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act===


'''WHEREAS''' Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and  
'''WHEREAS''' Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and  

Revision as of 22:16, 12 August 2012

23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act

WHEREAS Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and

WHEREAS the Justices can't make fair decisions when they sit in the Ziu at the same time they sit in the Cort;

THEREFORE the Ziu says that Cort Justices must quit every seat in the Ziu that they currently have; and

THEREFORE, in the future, Cort Justices cannot hold seats in any house of the Ziu.

Uréu q'estadra så:
Evan P. Gallagher - (Whig-Pengöpäts)
Maxime Paquin-Charbonneau - (RCT-Florenciâ)

Scribe's Notes

  1. This act failed to pass the Ziu.

ScriberyBadge.png This page is maintained under authority of the Scribery of Abbavilla.
Această páxhină isch sub l'auþorità dal Scriuerïă d'Abbavilla.