Talk:Political parties: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:You can sign your posts with four tildes, like this:--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) 01:49, 4 July 2012 (MSK) | :You can sign your posts with four tildes, like this:--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) 01:49, 4 July 2012 (MSK) | ||
:On second thought, no need to separate them. Just add them to the list.--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) | :On second thought, no need to separate them. Just add them to the list.--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) | ||
:: I chose to add them below the other list, but of course that doesn't have to be embossed in stone. | |||
:: I'm planning to add informations about how long they lasted, as well as the proper Talossan names. | |||
:: -[[DNV]], Jul 4,2012 10:45 CEST | |||
Revision as of 03:46, 4 July 2012
I'd like to ask if there will be objections to the addition of a list of parties that existed in the Talossan Republic. After all, the Talossan Republic was yet another instance of Talossa and returned to the mainstream. But I'm not intending to cause a ruckus, and I guess major changes to a page should be discussed by all before they're parachuted into the wiki.
- As long as you make the distinction clear, go ahead. Maybe another list below the main one, I think?
- You can sign your posts with four tildes, like this:--AD (talk) 01:49, 4 July 2012 (MSK)
- On second thought, no need to separate them. Just add them to the list.--AD (talk)
- I chose to add them below the other list, but of course that doesn't have to be embossed in stone.
- I'm planning to add informations about how long they lasted, as well as the proper Talossan names.
- -DNV, Jul 4,2012 10:45 CEST