User talk:AD/LC: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
15RC18 could be incorporated into the code to say something like "As Talossa represents and encourages peace amongst nations, any citizen who commits violence in the name of the Kingdom of Talossa without the authorization of the Ziu shall have committed a felony." You might could fit this somewhere in the criminal section of the code--if not, we'd be leaving a crime on the books without repealing it or inserting it into the code. [[User:Dien|Dien]] ([[User talk:Dien|talk]]) 22:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC) | 15RC18 could be incorporated into the code to say something like "As Talossa represents and encourages peace amongst nations, any citizen who commits violence in the name of the Kingdom of Talossa without the authorization of the Ziu shall have committed a felony." You might could fit this somewhere in the criminal section of the code--if not, we'd be leaving a crime on the books without repealing it or inserting it into the code. [[User:Dien|Dien]] ([[User talk:Dien|talk]]) 22:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I'll fit in the existing language as much as possible on 15RC18. Shouldn't be too hard.--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) 23:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:33, 15 December 2013
Are you going to header the sections to make them linkable, or were you just going to keep it in a Witt copy/pastable format? (I can understand either, but if it is the first, I can go ahead and get that done for ya.) Dien (talk) 02:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- I was going to eliminate formatting mostly, and just use : indents instead of quotes. Then when it comes to bring it back over to Witt, I will go through and requote those sections. I'm not going to header the sections, no. That would make it too much of a hassle to redo later. use your scrollwheel!--AD (talk) 02:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ahhh! So lazyyyy! Lol. Dien (talk) 02:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, changed my mind... the bill looks a thousands times better here, so why not go all the way? It'll end up on here anyway, after all.--AD (talk) 15:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Welcome to the dark side! We have motorized wheelchairs. :D By the way, found something that needs to be changed: "5.4. Civil disability. Civil disabilities may be imposed in conjunction with a suspended sentence upon conviction of any crime for which imprisonment is authorized, but where a sentence of imprisonment or revocation of citizenship has been suspended pursuant to section 3 of this act." Seems like section 3 should be subsection 3 or section 5.3 or something like that...its been bugging me since I read the first draft on Witt. xD Dien (talk) 21:07, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, changed my mind... the bill looks a thousands times better here, so why not go all the way? It'll end up on here anyway, after all.--AD (talk) 15:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Ahhh! So lazyyyy! Lol. Dien (talk) 02:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
15RC18/18RC21
I've changed my mind on 18RC21 and "withdraw" my objection.
15RC18 could be incorporated into the code to say something like "As Talossa represents and encourages peace amongst nations, any citizen who commits violence in the name of the Kingdom of Talossa without the authorization of the Ziu shall have committed a felony." You might could fit this somewhere in the criminal section of the code--if not, we'd be leaving a crime on the books without repealing it or inserting it into the code. Dien (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)