Law:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill: Difference between revisions

From TalossaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:
==48RZ32, The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill==
==48RZ32, The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill==
{{LawZiuStatus
{{LawZiuStatus
|status= {{LawStatusPending}}
|status= {{Failed}}
|sponsor= Miestrâ Schivâ
|sponsor= Miestrâ Schivâ
|ziu= 48th
|ziu= 48th
|clark= 6th
|clark= 6th
|cosa= {{passed}}
|cosa= {{failed}}
|cyes=0
|cyes=35
|cno=0
|cno=46
|cabs=0
|cabs=71
|senats= {{passed}}
|senats= {{passed}}
|syes=0
|syes=5
|sno=0
|sno=2
|sabs=0
|sabs=0
|referendum=
|referendum=

Latest revision as of 17:56, 30 March 2016

Debate:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill

48RZ32, The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill

FAILED
Ziu 48th Clark 6th
Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ

Cosa.png Cosă: FAILED
Per 35 — Con 46 — Aus 71

Senats.png Senäts: PASSED
Per 5 — Con 2 — Aus 0

L'Anuntziă dels Legeux

View Clark Result


Be the following section added to Section G.3 of the OrgLaw, concerning guidelines that shall exist for the practice of law within the realm:


3.12 The reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram, well-known in United Kingdom libel law (http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html), shall be considered good practice from counsel under Talossan law in response to any use of the law to threaten people or suppress free debate.


Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ - (Senator Fiova)


ScriberyBadge.png This page is maintained under authority of the Scribery of Abbavilla.
Această páxhină isch sub l'auþorità dal Scriuerïă d'Abbavilla.