Law:The Multiple Office Prohibition Act: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act== '''WHEREAS''' Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and '''WHEREAS''' the Justices can't make fair decisio...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act== | ===23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act=== | ||
'''WHEREAS''' Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and | '''WHEREAS''' Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and | ||
Revision as of 21:16, 12 August 2012
23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act
WHEREAS Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and
WHEREAS the Justices can't make fair decisions when they sit in the Ziu at the same time they sit in the Cort;
THEREFORE the Ziu says that Cort Justices must quit every seat in the Ziu that they currently have; and
THEREFORE, in the future, Cort Justices cannot hold seats in any house of the Ziu.
Uréu q'estadra så:
Evan P. Gallagher - (Whig-Pengöpäts)
Maxime Paquin-Charbonneau - (RCT-Florenciâ)
Scribe's Notes
- This act failed to pass the Ziu.
