Law:The Multiple Office Prohibition Act: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Uréu q'estadra så: | Uréu q'estadra så: | ||
<br />Evan P. Gallagher - (Whig-Pengöpäts) | <br />Evan P. Gallagher - (Whig-Pengöpäts) | ||
<br /> | <br />Mximo Carbonèl - (RCT-Florenciâ) | ||
==Scribe's Notes== | ==Scribe's Notes== | ||
# This act failed to pass the Ziu. | # This act failed to pass the Ziu. | ||
{{ScribeAuth}} | {{ScribeAuth}} | ||
Revision as of 10:40, 20 November 2012
23RZ24 — The Multiple Office Prohibition Act
WHEREAS Cort Justices have to make impartial judgements; and
WHEREAS the Justices can't make fair decisions when they sit in the Ziu at the same time they sit in the Cort;
THEREFORE the Ziu says that Cort Justices must quit every seat in the Ziu that they currently have; and
THEREFORE, in the future, Cort Justices cannot hold seats in any house of the Ziu.
Uréu q'estadra så:
Evan P. Gallagher - (Whig-Pengöpäts)
Mximo Carbonèl - (RCT-Florenciâ)
Scribe's Notes
- This act failed to pass the Ziu.
