Law:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill

From TalossaWiki
Revision as of 17:56, 30 March 2016 by ScribeBot (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Debate:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill

48RZ32, The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill

FAILED
Ziu 48th Clark 6th
Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ
Cosa.png Cosă: FAILED
Per 35 — Con 46 — Aus 71
Senats.png Senäts: PASSED
Per 5 — Con 2 — Aus 0
L'Anuntziă dels Legeux
View Clark Result


Be the following section added to Section G.3 of the OrgLaw, concerning guidelines that shall exist for the practice of law within the realm:


3.12 The reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram, well-known in United Kingdom libel law (http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html), shall be considered good practice from counsel under Talossan law in response to any use of the law to threaten people or suppress free debate.


Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ - (Senator Fiova)


ScriberyBadge.png This page is maintained under authority of the Scribery of Abbavilla.
Această páxhină isch sub l'auþorità dal Scriuerïă d'Abbavilla.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.talossa.com/index.php?title=Law:The_Arkell_v._Pressdram_Bill&oldid=23256"