Debate:The Chronological Days of Observance Act: Difference between revisions
Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Law:The Chronological Days of Observance Act Date Introduced to the Hopper: Author: {{ScribeAuth}}") |
Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Law:The Chronological Days of Observance Act]] | [[Law:The Chronological Days of Observance Act]] | ||
Date Introduced to the Hopper: | Date Introduced to the Hopper: Aug 4, 2015 at 7:19pm<br /> | ||
Author: | Author: Ian Plätschisch<br /> | ||
====Sir Alexandreu Davinescu Aug 4, 2015 at 8:14pm==== | |||
I support this. When I put together this title of the law, I just put the holidays in as I found them... in the order they were passed, basically. This is better. | |||
====Sir Alexandreu Davinescu Aug 26, 2015 at 11:12am==== | |||
Hopefully this will be clarked in this month's Clark. | |||
====Marti-Pair Furxheir Sep 1, 2015 at 7:46am==== | |||
<small>Quote: Aug 26, 2015 at 11:12am Sir Alexandreu Davinescu said:<br /> | |||
Hopefully this will be clarked in this month's Clark.</small> | |||
It's not, the August Clark was already published 26 days ago... I thought you knew that. | |||
It was Clark on the next Month's Clark, which, by now, is this month's Clark, since we are now in September, but still, that doesn't make you right, since when you posted it, it was still August, even if right now it's September. | |||
This is how time works... forward. After August comes September, and with it, a new Clark, published this morning, with this bill in it. | |||
But don't think only that Bill is in it! For the price of a single Clark, you get MULTIPLE bills! Isn't that great? | |||
====Sir Alexandreu Davinescu Sep 1, 2015 at 9:24am==== | |||
I have been duly sassed. | |||
{{ScribeAuth}} | {{ScribeAuth}} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:29, 13 December 2015
Law:The Chronological Days of Observance Act
Date Introduced to the Hopper: Aug 4, 2015 at 7:19pm
Author: Ian Plätschisch
Sir Alexandreu Davinescu Aug 4, 2015 at 8:14pm
I support this. When I put together this title of the law, I just put the holidays in as I found them... in the order they were passed, basically. This is better.
Sir Alexandreu Davinescu Aug 26, 2015 at 11:12am
Hopefully this will be clarked in this month's Clark.
Marti-Pair Furxheir Sep 1, 2015 at 7:46am
Quote: Aug 26, 2015 at 11:12am Sir Alexandreu Davinescu said:
Hopefully this will be clarked in this month's Clark.
It's not, the August Clark was already published 26 days ago... I thought you knew that.
It was Clark on the next Month's Clark, which, by now, is this month's Clark, since we are now in September, but still, that doesn't make you right, since when you posted it, it was still August, even if right now it's September.
This is how time works... forward. After August comes September, and with it, a new Clark, published this morning, with this bill in it.
But don't think only that Bill is in it! For the price of a single Clark, you get MULTIPLE bills! Isn't that great?
Sir Alexandreu Davinescu Sep 1, 2015 at 9:24am
I have been duly sassed.
