Real Cosa: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "The idea of a '''Real Cosa''' is the idea that the amount of Cosa seats should adapt to the amount of people sitting on them, as opposed to there being a set amount. {{st...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The | The '''Real Cosa''' is a method of apportioning votes in the [[Cosa]] that relies on the distribution of a small set of indivisible seats (historically fixed at 20). It may be contrasted with the current [[EM200]] method. The [[Kingdom of Talossa]] had a Real Cosa from the introduction of the [[Organic Law]] in {{year|1997}} until {{year|2003}}, when the nation returned to EM200. Different individuals have since called for its reintroduction at various times, calling the EM200 Cosa a "D&D Cosa" and "silly,"<ref>Madison, Robert Ben. ''Ar Pats.'' 2008. p.78</ref> and pointing to the increased difficulty of obtaining seats in the Cosa as a benefit that would increase political competition and spur Talossa's elected representatives to greater efforts. | ||
{{ | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | |||
[[Category:History]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:50, 16 June 2014
The Real Cosa is a method of apportioning votes in the Cosa that relies on the distribution of a small set of indivisible seats (historically fixed at 20). It may be contrasted with the current EM200 method. The Kingdom of Talossa had a Real Cosa from the introduction of the Organic Law in 1997/XVIII until 2003/XXIV, when the nation returned to EM200. Different individuals have since called for its reintroduction at various times, calling the EM200 Cosa a "D&D Cosa" and "silly,"[1] and pointing to the increased difficulty of obtaining seats in the Cosa as a benefit that would increase political competition and spur Talossa's elected representatives to greater efforts.
References
- ↑ Madison, Robert Ben. Ar Pats. 2008. p.78