Search results

WHEREAS Talossa has historically been loath to impose "libel laws" upon its citizens; and ...dication the person making the charge shall be legally responsible for his libel.

...ply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram, well-known in United Kingdom libel law (http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html), shall b

'''WHEREAS''' actual verbal assault, harassment, libel, and such crimes have already been made criminal in Talossa by the incorpor

...eu (UC)|Glaçâ v. Støtanneu]], in which he sued the paper [[Støtanneu]] for libel.

...sued the newspaper [[Stotanneu|''Støtanneu'']] (run by [[Robert I]]) for [[libel]]. The newspaper labelled the SPP as a "party of prevaricators", similar to

...er court’s conviction finding Ben-Ard guilty of the class A misdemeanor of libel); Talossa v Ben-Ard et al (refusing to respond to a petition filed by the M

...longer in post, this case has determined, if nothing else, that in Talossa libel per se is a misdemeanour, even where there is no material loss.

...lso call for the assistance of the association in legal matters, including libel cases.

...s opportunity for someone a thousand miles away to hurl invective (without libel, mind you) with no real-life consequences. Ben seems to have taken full ad