Law:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Debate:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill ==48RZ32, The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill== {{LawZiuStatus |status= {{LawStatusPending}} |sponsor= SPONSORNAMES |ziu= 48th |clark= 6th |co...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==48RZ32, The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill== | ==48RZ32, The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill== | ||
{{LawZiuStatus | {{LawZiuStatus | ||
|status= {{ | |status= {{Failed}} | ||
|sponsor= | |sponsor= Miestrâ Schivâ | ||
|ziu= 48th | |ziu= 48th | ||
|clark= 6th | |clark= 6th | ||
|cosa= {{ | |cosa= {{failed}} | ||
|cyes= | |cyes=35 | ||
|cno= | |cno=46 | ||
|cabs= | |cabs=71 | ||
|senats= {{passed}} | |senats= {{passed}} | ||
|syes= | |syes=5 | ||
|sno= | |sno=2 | ||
|sabs=0 | |sabs=0 | ||
|referendum= | |referendum= | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Be the following section added to Section G.3 of the OrgLaw, concerning guidelines that shall exist for the practice of law within the realm: | |||
3.12 The reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram, well-known in United Kingdom libel law (http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html), shall be considered good practice from counsel under Talossan law in response to any use of the law to threaten people or suppress free debate. | |||
Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ - (Senator Fiova) | |||
{{ScribeAuth}} | {{ScribeAuth}} | ||
Latest revision as of 17:56, 30 March 2016
Debate:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill
