Law:50RZ3 The Fleshing Out IRV Act: Difference between revisions

From TalossaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{LawZiuStatus |status= {{LawStatusActive}} |sponsor= Ian Plätschisch |ziu= 50<sup>th</sup> |clark= 2<sup>nd</sup> |cosa= {{passed}} |cyes=159 |cno=21 |cabs=8 |senats= {...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LawZiuStatus
{{LawZiuStatus
|status= {{LawStatusActive}}
|number=50RZ3
|status=Lex
|lexhtitle={{TB}}
|sponsor=  [[Ian Plätschisch]]
|sponsor=  [[Ian Plätschisch]]
|ziu= 50<sup>th</sup>
|ziu= 50th
|clark= 2<sup>nd</sup>
|clark= 2nd
|cosa= {{passed}}
|cosa= {{passed}}
|cyes=159
|cyes=159
Line 12: Line 14:
|sno=0
|sno=0
|sabs=0
|sabs=0
|referendum=
|ryes=
|rno=
|rabs=
|amm=
|law1=
|law2=
|law3=
|Damm= y
|Dlaw1= [[El Lexhatx]], Title B
|Dlaw2=
|Dlaw3=
}}
}}
====50RZ3, The Fleshing Out IRV Act====
WHEREAS Senate elections are now conducted using Ranked Choice Voting, and
'''WHEREAS''' Senate elections are now conducted using Ranked Choice Voting, and


'''WHEREAS''' There is some concern that there are not enough specifics regarding how RCV is to be implemented, and
WHEREAS There is some concern that there are not enough specifics regarding how RCV is to be implemented, and


'''WHEREAS''' I guess I better write some specifics
WHEREAS I guess I better write some specifics


'''THEREFORE''', the following provisions shall be added to el Lexhatx:
'''THEREFORE''', the following provisions shall be added to el Lexhatx:


:''B.14: In accordance with Org.IV.6, Ranked Choice Voting shall be conducted in the following manner:
<blockquote>''B.14: In accordance with Org.IV.6, Ranked Choice Voting shall be conducted in the following manner:


::''B.14.1: Voters shall rank the candidates for Senator for their province in order of preference. Voters may rank as many or as few candidates as they please.
::''B.14.1: Voters shall rank the candidates for Senator for their province in order of preference. Voters may rank as many or as few candidates as they please.
Line 46: Line 35:
::''B.14.5: If any ballot assigned to an eliminated candidate does not express a next preference, the ballot is treated in the same way as an abstention.
::''B.14.5: If any ballot assigned to an eliminated candidate does not express a next preference, the ballot is treated in the same way as an abstention.


::''B.14.6: A candidate may not be assigned ballots after he has been eliminated. A ballot that would otherwise be reassigned to an eliminated candidate is instead assigned to the highest-ranked candidate that has not been eliminated, or treated as an abstention according to B.14.4.''
::''B.14.6: A candidate may not be assigned ballots after he has been eliminated. A ballot that would otherwise be reassigned to an eliminated candidate is instead assigned to the highest-ranked candidate that has not been eliminated, or treated as an abstention according to B.14.4.''</blockquote>


Uréu q’estadra så:<br />
{{ScribeAuth}}
:Ian Plätschisch - (MC-MRPT)

Latest revision as of 17:39, 23 March 2023

50RZ3
Amends.png
EPHEMERAL STATUS
LEGEU
It amends the following:
Lexhatx (§ B)
Ziu 50th Clark 2nd
Uréu q'estadra så: Ian Plätschisch
Cosa.png Cosă: PASSED
Per 159 — Con 21 — Aus 8
Senats.png Senäts: PASSED
Per 8 — Con 0 — Aus 0
L'Anuntziă dels Legeux
View Clark Result

WHEREAS Senate elections are now conducted using Ranked Choice Voting, and

WHEREAS There is some concern that there are not enough specifics regarding how RCV is to be implemented, and

WHEREAS I guess I better write some specifics

THEREFORE, the following provisions shall be added to el Lexhatx:

B.14: In accordance with Org.IV.6, Ranked Choice Voting shall be conducted in the following manner:

B.14.1: Voters shall rank the candidates for Senator for their province in order of preference. Voters may rank as many or as few candidates as they please.
B.14.2: At the conclusion of the election, each candidate is assigned all ballots which express him as first preference. The candidate with the fewest ballots assigned to him is eliminated. Each ballot cast for the eliminated candidate is reassigned to the next expressed preference on the ballot.
B.14.3: Once the ballots are reassigned, the candidate with the fewest ballots assigned to him is eliminated and the ballots cast for him reassigned according to B.14.2. This process is repeated until one candidate wins by having a majority of non-abstention ballots assigned to him.
B.14.4: If, after any iteration, there are two or more candidates with the fewest ballots assigned to them, the candidate with the fewest first preferences assigned to him shall be eliminated. If these candidates all have the same number of first preferences assigned to them, the candidate with the fewest second preferences assigned to him shall be eliminated, and so forth.
B.14.5: If any ballot assigned to an eliminated candidate does not express a next preference, the ballot is treated in the same way as an abstention.
B.14.6: A candidate may not be assigned ballots after he has been eliminated. A ballot that would otherwise be reassigned to an eliminated candidate is instead assigned to the highest-ranked candidate that has not been eliminated, or treated as an abstention according to B.14.4.

ScriberyBadge.png This page is maintained under authority of the Scribery of Abbavilla.
Această páxhină isch sub l'auþorità dal Scriuerïă d'Abbavilla.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.talossa.com/index.php?title=Law:50RZ3_The_Fleshing_Out_IRV_Act&oldid=30538"