Law:48RZ36 Another Reformatting Act: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Debate:Another Reformatting Act ==48RZ36, Another Reformatting Act== {{LawZiuStatus |status= {{LawStatusPending}} |sponsor= SPONSORNAMES |ziu= 48th |clark= 6th |cosa= {{pa...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{LawZiuStatus | {{LawZiuStatus | ||
|status= {{ | |number=48RZ36 | ||
|sponsor= | |status= Lex | ||
|lexhtitle={{TH}} | |||
|sponsor= Ian Plätschisch | |||
|ziu= 48th | |ziu= 48th | ||
|clark= 6th | |clark= 6th | ||
|cosa= {{passed}} | |cosa= {{passed}} | ||
|cyes= | |cyes=122 | ||
|cno= | |cno=19 | ||
|cabs= | |cabs=11 | ||
|senats= {{passed}} | |senats= {{passed}} | ||
|syes= | |syes=5 | ||
|sno= | |sno=1 | ||
|sabs= | |sabs=1 | ||
|Dlaw3= | |Dlaw3= | ||
}} | }} | ||
WHEREAS Lex.H.2 has many subsections which, by proper convention, should really be broken down in subsubsections, and | |||
WHEREAS The current law references subsections which don't exist, and | |||
WHEREAS I like the law to look pretty, and | |||
WHEREAS we all like the law to look pretty, and | |||
WHEREAS if I Clark a bill next month I will have Clarked a bill in all six Clarks | |||
THEREFORE Lex.H.2 which currently reads; | |||
2. The Cosa authorises a question and answer period during Living Cosas. This will be called "Terpelaziuns" ('enquiries') or, for short, "Terps," or "Question Time." During Terpelaziuns, each MC may ask any other MC one question (plus a follow-up) and expect to receive some sort of answer. The Opposition Leader shall put the first question. Questions shall alternate between Government and Opposition members until all MCs on one side or the other have spoken. The remaining MCs may then put questions. Questions will be politely phrased in the third person and directed at the Speaker. Order of Questioners will be determined on an ad hoc basis by the Speaker. (14RC9) | |||
2.1. Any Member of the Cosa (MC) or Senator may at any time between the First and Last Clark of a Cosa Term, table in “The Ziu” board on Witt, or its equivalent, a “c (PQ)” or “Terp” in a new thread or its equivalent. (44RZ1) | |||
2.2. The PQ or Terp may ask one question to a named Member of the Government relating to Public Affairs connected with their Ministry or on matters of administration for which they are officially responsible. | |||
2.3. There is no limit to the number of PQs or Terps a MC or Senator may submit in any given Clark. | |||
2.4. Any PQ or Terp that is submitted by a MC or Senator in accordance with Section 1 above, must be answered by the named Minister within seven (7) days of the question being tabled. Should the Minister be unavailable to answer the question within the seven (7) days, the question shall be redirected to the Prime Minister or his/her appointed Deputy who shall be granted a further seven (7) days to answer the aforementioned question. With the agreement of the questioner, there may be a extension of seven (7) days on top of this period. However, the period from the asking of the question to the answering of the question, shall in no circumstances exceed twenty one (21) days. | |||
2.5. For the purpose of subsection (a) above, “unavailable” means being unable for to access Witt, or its equivalent, for a acceptable and reasonable reason. Having Logged into or visited Witt during the seven day period, or its equivalent and having not seen or ignored the PQ or Terp, shall not constituent being unavailable. (c) This provision shall not apply PQs or Terps which refer to matters of Security or Defence of His Majesty’s Realm and/or any project(s), Correspondence or activities in which the Government has deemed and classed as confidential or its release may damage the Kingdom in any shape or form. Such questions may not be answered by any Minister. | |||
2.6. The Minister must answer the question in the same thread or its equivalent as the original question and the questioner may ask one (1) supplementary question, in which subsection (a) above applies, with the seven days starting from the date the supplementary question is asked. | |||
2.7. Failure to answer a question within the given timeframe shall constitute an offense and a Minister if found guilty of such a offense, will be subject to a punishment at the discretion of the Courts. | |||
2.8. It shall be a defence to the Minister if the questioner, notwithstanding any other legitimate defences, did not or failed to: (i) Correctly title his/her question or; (ii) Ask a clear question. E.g. An ambiguous question, in which the Minister tried to clarify but failed to do so in the timeframe and did not subsequently answer. Or; (iii) Post his/her question in the correct board, or; (iv) Engage with the Minister in trying to answer his/her question or; (v) Direct the question to one named Minister. | |||
Is hereby amended to read; | |||
2. The Cosa authorises a question and answer period during Living Cosas. This will be called "Terpelaziuns" ('enquiries') or, for short, "Terps," or "Question Time." During Terpelaziuns, each MC may ask any other MC one question (plus a follow-up) and expect to receive some sort of answer. The Opposition Leader shall put the first question. Questions shall alternate between Government and Opposition members until all MCs on one side or the other have spoken. The remaining MCs may then put questions. Questions will be politely phrased in the third person and directed at the Speaker. Order of Questioners will be determined on an ad hoc basis by the Speaker. (14RC9) | |||
2.1. Any Member of the Cosa (MC) or Senator may at any time between the First and Last Clark of a Cosa Term, table in “The Ziu” board on Witt, or its equivalent, a “c (PQ)” or “Terp” in a new thread or its equivalent. (44RZ1) | |||
2.2. The PQ or Terp may ask one question to a named Member of the Government relating to Public Affairs connected with their Ministry or on matters of administration for which they are officially responsible. | |||
2.3. There is no limit to the number of PQs or Terps a MC or Senator may submit in any given Clark. | |||
2.4. Any PQ or Terp that is submitted by a MC or Senator in accordance with the provisions of H.2 must be answered by the named Minister within seven (7) days of the question being tabled. Should the Minister be unavailable to answer the question within the seven (7) days, the question shall be redirected to the Prime Minister or his/her appointed Deputy who shall be granted a further seven (7) days to answer the aforementioned question. With the agreement of the questioner, there may be a extension of seven (7) days on top of this period. However, the period from the asking of the question to the answering of the question, shall in no circumstances exceed twenty one (21) days. | |||
2.5. For the purpose of H.2.4, “unavailable” means being unable for to access Witt, or its equivalent, for a acceptable and reasonable reason. Having Logged into or visited Witt during the seven day period, or its equivalent and having not seen or ignored the PQ or Terp, shall not constituent being unavailable. This provision shall not apply PQs or Terps which refer to matters of Security or Defence of His Majesty’s Realm and/or any project(s), Correspondence or activities in which the Government has deemed and classed as confidential or its release may damage the Kingdom in any shape or form. Such questions may not be answered by any Minister. | |||
2.6. The Minister must answer the question in the same thread or its equivalent as the original question and the questioner may ask one (1) supplementary question, in which the provisions of H.2 apply, with the seven days starting from the date the supplementary question is asked. | |||
2.7. Failure to answer a question within the given timeframe shall constitute an offense and a Minister if found guilty of such a offense, will be subject to a punishment at the discretion of the Courts. | |||
2.8. It shall be a defence to the Minister if the questioner, notwithstanding any other legitimate defences, did not or failed to: | |||
2.8.1 Correctly title his/her question | |||
2.8.2 Ask a clear question. E.g. An ambiguous question, in which the Minister tried to clarify but failed to do so in the timeframe and did not subsequently answer | |||
2.8.3 Post his/her question in the correct board | |||
2.8.4 Engage with the Minister in trying to answer his/her question | |||
2.8.5 Direct the question to one named Minister | |||
Uréu q'estadra så: Ian Plätschisch - (MC-MRPT) | |||
{{ScribeAuth}} | {{ScribeAuth}} | ||
[[Debate:Another Reformatting Act]] | |||
