Law:52RZ16 Mega-Amendment: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Ugot moved page 52RZ16 to Law:52RZ16 Mega-Amendment) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 08:39, 23 April 2023
RZ16 - Mega-Amendment
Primary Sources: see Acts of the 52nd Cosa
 FAILED TO PASS |
Ziu 52nd Clark 6th (February 2019)
Uréu q'estadra så: Alexandreu Davinescu - (MC, RUMP) |
 Cosă: Rejected in the Cosâ |
| Per 145 — Con 22 — Aus 25 |
 Senäts: Rejected in the Senäts |
| Per 1 — Con 5 — Aus 2 |
L'Anuntziă dels Legeux |
View Clark Result |
RZ16 - Mega-Amendment
Whereas there are some specific improvements that can be made to the Organic Law, and
Whereas the first part of this bill shall remove some bits that perhaps do not belong in a supreme governing document but which still deserve special protection, and
Whereas the second part of this bill shall fix the many places where the OrgLaw has been edited and not renumbered by lazy legislators, and
Whereas the third part of this bill provides an Organic way to remove a monarch even if they have not been criminal, since the sovereign must have the consent of the people, but assures that the removal has such a high bar that it will nonetheless protect the monarch's role in our nation to stand outside of elections, so that only either a huge majority or two subsequent two-thirds majorities may remove an erring monarch,
I. Entrenched Law
Therefore, Article IX shall have a new Section 6, which shall read,
There shall be a standing and coherent legal code for the nation, called el Lexhatx. The first section of el Lexhatx shall be known as "Title A: Entrenched Law." Bills that add, alter, or remove laws within Title A shall require a two-thirds majority of the Cosa, joined with a majority of the Senats.
Furthermore, el Lexhatx shall be modified in the following way: Title A shall be renamed Title B, Title B shall be renamed Title C, and henceforth through to Title L, will shall be renamed Title M. All references within el Lexhatx shall be accordingly renamed so as to correctly identify the same provisions that they currently indicate.
Furthermore, Article I of the Organic Law shall be modified so as to remove Sections 7, 8, 9, and 10.
Furthermore, the text of these sections shall be placed in the newly-created Title A: Entrenched Law of el Lexhatx, reading identically to their current text and numbered in the same sequence.
II. Fixing Holes
Furthermore, Article IV of the Organic Law shall be modified so as to remove the repealed Section 5. The existing Sections 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 shall be renumbered 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, respectively. Any and all references to the existing Sections shall be altered to indicate the new numbering and thus preserve the current meaning.
Furthermore, Article V of the Organic Law shall be modified so as to remove the repealed Section 4. The existing Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 shall be renumbered 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, respectively. Any and all references to the existing Sections shall be altered to indicate the new numbering and thus preserve the current meaning.
Furthermore, Article VII of the Organic Law shall be modified so as to remove the repealed Sections 7, 8, and 9. The existing Section 10 shall be renumbered Section 7. Any and all references to the existing Sections shall be altered to indicate the new numbering and thus preserve the current meaning.
Furthermore, Article XVIII of the Organic Law shall be modified so as to remove the repealed Section 4. The existing Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 shall be renumbered Sections 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13, respectively. Any and all references to the existing Sections shall be altered to indicate the new numbering and thus preserve the current meaning.
III. Deposing Clause
Furthermore, Article VII of the Organic Law shall be modified so that Sections 4, 5, and 6, which currently read:
Section 4 The Throne shall be inherited by the descendants of His Majesty, John I, King of Talossa. The present Royal Family is styled El Ca Lupul (The House and Dynasty of Lupul). Should the King at any time renounce or lose his citizenship, that renunciation or loss shall be deemed to imply his abdication of the Throne. Upon the demise, abdication, or removal from the Throne of any King, the Crown shall pass to his next heir; but if the King has no heir, the Crown shall pass to the next heir of the previous King, or (if he in turn has no heir) to the next heir of the next previous King before him, and so on, back to King John.
For the purpose of determining who is the King's next heir, each person shall be followed in the line of succession by his natural legitimate children (whether born or unborn at the time of the King's death) in order of their birth (each followed by their own descendants).
Section 5 If the Crown should pass to any person who does not wish at that juncture to become King, who cannot legally be King, who is suspended from the line of succession, who is not a citizen of Talossa, or who has previously been King and has abdicated the Throne, it shall instead pass to the next person after him in the line of succession.
Section 6 The Ziu may, by a resolution of two thirds of each House, not subject to veto, suspend any person from his place in the line of succession, and may, by a resolution of a majority of either House, not subject to veto, remove such a suspension and restore the suspended person to his place.
shall be struck from the law, and a new Section 4 shall be added which shall read:
The Throne shall be inherited by the descendants of His Majesty, John I, King of Talossa. The present Royal Family is styled El Ca Lupul (The House and Dynasty of Lupul). Should the King at any time renounce or lose his citizenship, that renunciation or loss shall be deemed to imply his abdication of the Throne. Upon the demise, abdication, or removal from the Throne of any King, the Crown shall pass to his next heir; but if the King has no heir, the Crown shall pass to the next heir of the previous King, or (if he in turn has no heir) to the next heir of the next previous King before him, and so on, back to King John.
For the purpose of determining who is the King's next heir, each person shall be followed in the line of succession by his natural legitimate children (whether born or unborn at the time of the King's death) in order of their birth (each followed by their own descendants). If the Crown should pass to any person who does not wish at that juncture to become King, who cannot legally be King, who is suspended from the line of succession, who is not a citizen of Talossa, or who has previously been King and has abdicated the Throne, it shall instead pass to the next person after him in the line of succession.
The Ziu may, by a resolution of two thirds of each House, not subject to veto, suspend any person from his place in the line of succession, and may, by a resolution of a majority of either House, not subject to veto, remove such a suspension and restore the suspended person to his place.
Furthermore, the existing Section 7 of this Article shall be renumbered as Section 5
Furthermore, a new Section 6 shall be added to this Article, which shall read:
In the event that the Monarch is determined by a medical authority to be incapable of executing their duties, the Monarch shall be deemed to have abdicated the Crown. This medical authority must be a practicing and board-certified medical professional, and their determination must be made in writing and confirmed by a two-thirds majority of each house of the Ziu.
If the Monarch is deprived of their natural liberty due to crimes committed in another sovereign State, or if they are convicted of high crimes by the Cort pu Inalt, the Ziu may vote by a two-thirds majority of each house to deem that the Monarch has abdicated the Crown, so long as this vote is confirmed by two-thirds of the voting public in a referendum that may be conducted no sooner than three months from the time of the Ziu's decision.
Furthermore, Sections 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 of this same Article shall be renumbered Sections 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, respectively.
Furthermore, these changes in their entirety are dependent on the failure of the concurrently proposed "The Final Draft of the 2019 Amendment to the Organic Law" bill. Should the Final Draft of the 219 Amendment to the Organic Law pass the Ziu and pass in a referendum with the people of Talossa, then none of the changes found within this bill shall be made.
Uréu q'estadra så: Alexandreu Davinescu - (MC, RUMP)