Law:50RZ18 THE ORGANIC LAW AMENDMENT (Amendments (I Can't Believe This Is Still Ambiguous But Apparently It Is)) BILL: Difference between revisions

From TalossaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{LawZiuStatus |status= {{LawStatusPending}} |sponsor= Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN |ziu= 50th |clark= 4th |cosa= {{passed}} |cyes=113 |cno=15 |cabs=0 |senats={{passed}} |syes=5...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LawZiuStatus
{{LawZiuStatus
|status= {{LawStatusPending}}
|number=50RZ18
|status= OrgOld
|sponsor= [[Miestrâ Schivâ]], UrN
|sponsor= [[Miestrâ Schivâ]], UrN
|ziu= 50th
|ziu= 50th
Line 12: Line 13:
|sno=2
|sno=2
|sabs=0
|sabs=0
|referendum=
|referendum={{passed}}
|ryes=
|ryes=67
|rno=
|rno=34
|rabs=
|rabs=21
|amm=
|amm=
|law1=
|law1=
Line 25: Line 26:
|Dlaw3=
|Dlaw3=
}}
}}
====50RZ18, THE ORGANIC LAW AMENDMENT (Amendments (I Can't Believe This Is Still Ambiguous But Apparently It Is)) BILL====
'''WHEREAS''' it seemed clear that the decision of the Cort pü Înalt in April 2016 which resolved the "Proclamation Crisis" and the subsequent adoption of the current text of Article XV of the OrgLaw had sorted out whether an Organic Law amendment must be "proclaimed" or "promulgated" to take effect;
'''WHEREAS''' it seemed clear that the decision of the Cort pü Înalt in April 2016 which resolved the "Proclamation Crisis" and the subsequent adoption of the current text of Article XV of the OrgLaw had sorted out whether an Organic Law amendment must be "proclaimed" or "promulgated" to take effect;


Line 45: Line 43:
:Ian Plätschisch - MC,MRPT
:Ian Plätschisch - MC,MRPT
:Mximo Carbonel - MC,REP
:Mximo Carbonel - MC,REP
{{ScribeAuth}}

Latest revision as of 14:43, 9 April 2023

50RZ18
Amends.png
EPHEMERAL STATUS
LEGEU
It amends the following:
Legeu Orgänic (avant 2019/XL)
Ziu 50th Clark 4th
Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ, UrN
Cosa.png Cosă: PASSED
Per 113 — Con 15 — Aus 0
Senats.png Senäts: PASSED
Per 5 — Con 2 — Aus 0
LesserSealBadge.png Referendum: PASSED
Per 67 — Con 34 — Aus 21
L'Anuntziă dels Legeux
View Clark Result

WHEREAS it seemed clear that the decision of the Cort pü Înalt in April 2016 which resolved the "Proclamation Crisis" and the subsequent adoption of the current text of Article XV of the OrgLaw had sorted out whether an Organic Law amendment must be "proclaimed" or "promulgated" to take effect;

and WHEREAS a recently withdrawn lawsuit, and the orders made by one CpI justice in the course of that lawsuit, and the subsequent ill-tempered threads on Wittenberg have shown that the above is surely not the case;

and WHEREAS this sort of tomfoolery should never happen again:

BE IT ENACTED by the King, Cosâ and Senäts of Talossa in Ziu assented and by the consent of the people in referendum that the text of Article XV, Section 4 of the Organic Law be amended by the addition of the following text in red:


After approval by the Ziu in accordance with the preceding sections, a proposed amendment shall be submitted to the people in a referendum. If the King objected to the proposed amendment under the preceding section, a statement of his objections not exceeding one hundred and fifty words shall be provided to the people along with the proposed amendment. The amendment shall take effect, and the King shall promulgate the amendment as part of this Organic Law, if it is approved by a majority of voters participating in a referendum on the question of the amendment no later than during the next scheduled general election following the approval of the Ziu, except as provided in the following sections.

Uréu q'estadra så:

Miestrâ Schivâ - MC,FreeDem
Lüc da Schir - Senator,Benito
Magniloqueu Épiqeu Ac’hlerglünä da Lhiun - Senator,MM
Ian Plätschisch - MC,MRPT
Mximo Carbonel - MC,REP

ScriberyBadge.png This page is maintained under authority of the Scribery of Abbavilla.
Această páxhină isch sub l'auþorità dal Scriuerïă d'Abbavilla.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.talossa.com/index.php?title=Law:50RZ18_THE_ORGANIC_LAW_AMENDMENT_(Amendments_(I_Can%27t_Believe_This_Is_Still_Ambiguous_But_Apparently_It_Is))_BILL&oldid=31126"