Law:52RZ11 The Logical Act: Difference between revisions

From TalossaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "''BILL NUMBER WITH TITLE''<br/> Primary Sources: see Acts of the 52nd Cosa<br/><br/> {{LawZiuStatus |status= {{LawStatusActive}}, or {{LawStatusPending}}, or {{LawStatusFa...")
 
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''BILL NUMBER WITH TITLE''<br/>
Primary Sources: see [[Acts of the 52nd Cosa]]<br/><br/>
{{LawZiuStatus
{{LawZiuStatus
|status= {{LawStatusActive}}, or {{LawStatusPending}}, or {{LawStatusFailed}}, or {{LawStatusEphemeral}} For more, see Category:Chancery_templates
|number=52RZ11
|sponsor=
|status= Lex
|lexhtitle= {{TB}}
|sponsor=[[Glüc da Dhi]]
|ziu= 52nd
|ziu= 52nd
|clark= 4th (November 2018)
|clark= 4th (November {{year|2018}})
|cosa= {{passed}} or {{rejected}} in the Cosâ
|cosa= {{passed}}
|cyes=  
|cyes= 119
|cno=  
|cno= 24
|cabs=  
|cabs= 13
|senats= {{passed}} or {{rejected}} in the Senäts
|senats= {{passed}}
|syes=  
|syes= 5
|sno=  
|sno= 1
|sabs=  
|sabs= 0
|referendum= {{passed}} or {{rejected}} in Referendum
|ryes= number per votes in the Referendum
|rno= number contra votes in the Referendum
|rabs= number austeneu votes in Referendum
|amm= yes, if the law has been amended
|law1= link to amending laws
|law2=
|law3=
|Damm= yes if the law amends other laws
|Dlaw1= link to amended laws
|Dlaw2=
|Dlaw3=
}}
}}
<br/>
<br/>
BILL NUMBER and TITLE
Whereas when IRV was introduced live was so wonderful, a miracle, oh, it was beautiful, magical, but


__Text of bill with sponsor__
Now it needs to be fixed to be more sensible, logical, oh, responsible, practical, and
 
Whereas in the past election multiple votes were received that listed the same candidate multiple times, and
 
Whereas if these additional votes for a candidate are counted among the totals for each preference level this could give these candidates and undue advantage in the case of ties, and
 
Whereas it is good to clear up any ambiguity about this matter, and
 
Whereas it furthermore would be wise to affirm what should happen in case a vote in a senatorial elections contains both valid and invalid parts (i.e. 1. valid candidate, 2. fictional character, 3. citizen of the wrong province, 4. valid candidate.), and
 
Whereas this bill was first drafted on the 28th of August 2018, which was Supertramp appreciation day, now
 
'''Therefore''' three sub-sections will be added after Lex.B.14.1. which will read:
 
<blockquote>14.2. If a voter submits a ranked list of preferences in which a candidate is listed multiple times, only the highest preference for that candidate is valid and the lower preferences for that candidate are invalid.
 
14.3. A preference for someone who is not eligible for the contested senate seat because they are either not a citizen of the province represented by the contested senate seat or not eligible to vote is considered invalid.
 
14.4. If a voter submits a ranked list of preference which includes both valid preferences for candidates and invalid preferences, such as described by Lex.B.14.2. or Lex.B.14.3., then the invalid preferences are ignored but the vote itself will still be valid and the preference for candidates will be considered in the order of the valid preferences.</blockquote>
 
'''Furthermore,''' the sub and sub-sub-sections directly following the new sub-section 14.4. will be re-numbered accordingly.
 
{{ScribeAuth}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 23 March 2023

52RZ11
Amends.png
EPHEMERAL STATUS
LEGEU
It amends the following:
Lexhatx (§ B)
Ziu 52nd Clark 4th (November 2018/XXXIX)
Uréu q'estadra så: Glüc da Dhi
Cosa.png Cosă: PASSED
Per 119 — Con 24 — Aus 13
Senats.png Senäts: PASSED
Per 5 — Con 1 — Aus 0
L'Anuntziă dels Legeux
View Clark Result


Whereas when IRV was introduced live was so wonderful, a miracle, oh, it was beautiful, magical, but

Now it needs to be fixed to be more sensible, logical, oh, responsible, practical, and

Whereas in the past election multiple votes were received that listed the same candidate multiple times, and

Whereas if these additional votes for a candidate are counted among the totals for each preference level this could give these candidates and undue advantage in the case of ties, and

Whereas it is good to clear up any ambiguity about this matter, and

Whereas it furthermore would be wise to affirm what should happen in case a vote in a senatorial elections contains both valid and invalid parts (i.e. 1. valid candidate, 2. fictional character, 3. citizen of the wrong province, 4. valid candidate.), and

Whereas this bill was first drafted on the 28th of August 2018, which was Supertramp appreciation day, now

Therefore three sub-sections will be added after Lex.B.14.1. which will read:

14.2. If a voter submits a ranked list of preferences in which a candidate is listed multiple times, only the highest preference for that candidate is valid and the lower preferences for that candidate are invalid.

14.3. A preference for someone who is not eligible for the contested senate seat because they are either not a citizen of the province represented by the contested senate seat or not eligible to vote is considered invalid.

14.4. If a voter submits a ranked list of preference which includes both valid preferences for candidates and invalid preferences, such as described by Lex.B.14.2. or Lex.B.14.3., then the invalid preferences are ignored but the vote itself will still be valid and the preference for candidates will be considered in the order of the valid preferences.

Furthermore, the sub and sub-sub-sections directly following the new sub-section 14.4. will be re-numbered accordingly.


ScriberyBadge.png This page is maintained under authority of the Scribery of Abbavilla.
Această páxhină isch sub l'auþorità dal Scriuerïă d'Abbavilla.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.talossa.com/index.php?title=Law:52RZ11_The_Logical_Act&oldid=30541"