User talk:AD/LC: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I was going to eliminate formatting mostly, and just use : indents instead of quotes. Then when it comes to bring it back over to Witt, I will go through and requote those sections. I'm not going to header the sections, no. That would make it too much of a hassle to redo later. use your scrollwheel!--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) 02:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC) | :I was going to eliminate formatting mostly, and just use : indents instead of quotes. Then when it comes to bring it back over to Witt, I will go through and requote those sections. I'm not going to header the sections, no. That would make it too much of a hassle to redo later. use your scrollwheel!--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) 02:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Ahhh! So lazyyyy! Lol. [[User:Dien|Dien]] ([[User talk:Dien|talk]]) 02:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC) | ::Ahhh! So lazyyyy! Lol. [[User:Dien|Dien]] ([[User talk:Dien|talk]]) 02:38, 13 December 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::Actually, changed my mind... the bill looks a thousands times better here, so why not go all the way? It'll end up on here anyway, after all.--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) 15:37, 14 December 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:37, 14 December 2013
Are you going to header the sections to make them linkable, or were you just going to keep it in a Witt copy/pastable format? (I can understand either, but if it is the first, I can go ahead and get that done for ya.) Dien (talk) 02:31, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
- I was going to eliminate formatting mostly, and just use : indents instead of quotes. Then when it comes to bring it back over to Witt, I will go through and requote those sections. I'm not going to header the sections, no. That would make it too much of a hassle to redo later. use your scrollwheel!--AD (talk) 02:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC)