Law:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Debate:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill ==48RZ32, The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill== {{LawZiuStatus |status= {{LawStatusPending}} |sponsor= SPONSORNAMES |ziu= 48th |clark= 6th |co...") |
Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{LawZiuStatus | {{LawZiuStatus | ||
|status= {{LawStatusPending}} | |status= {{LawStatusPending}} | ||
|sponsor= | |sponsor= Miestrâ Schivâ | ||
|ziu= 48th | |ziu= 48th | ||
|clark= 6th | |clark= 6th | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Be the following section added to Section G.3 of the OrgLaw, concerning guidelines that shall exist for the practice of law within the realm: | |||
3.12 The reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram, well-known in United Kingdom libel law (http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html), shall be considered good practice from counsel under Talossan law in response to any use of the law to threaten people or suppress free debate. | |||
Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ - (Senator Fiova) | |||
{{ScribeAuth}} | {{ScribeAuth}} | ||
Revision as of 18:41, 13 December 2015
Debate:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill
