Law:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill
Revision as of 18:41, 13 December 2015 by Djpdwyer86 (talk | contribs)
Debate:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill
Debate:The Arkell v. Pressdram Bill
 PENDING RATIFICATION |
Ziu 48th Clark 6th
Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ |
 Cosă: PASSED |
| Per 0 — Con 0 — Aus 0 |
 Senäts: PASSED |
| Per 0 — Con 0 — Aus 0 |
L'Anuntziă dels Legeux |
View Clark Result |
Be the following section added to Section G.3 of the OrgLaw, concerning guidelines that shall exist for the practice of law within the realm:
3.12 The reply given in the case of Arkell v. Pressdram, well-known in United Kingdom libel law (http://www.lettersofnote.com/2013/08/arkell-v-pressdram.html), shall be considered good practice from counsel under Talossan law in response to any use of the law to threaten people or suppress free debate.
Uréu q'estadra så: Miestrâ Schivâ - (Senator Fiova)
|
This page is maintained under authority of the Scribery of Abbavilla. Această páxhină isch sub l'auþorità dal Scriuerïă d'Abbavilla. |