Law:50RZ9 The This Is Not Happy Days And We Are Not The Fonz Bill: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Glüc da Dhi (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{LawZiuStatus |status= {{LawStatusActive}} |sponsor= Miestrâ Schivâ,UrN |ziu= 50th |clark= 2nd |cosa= {{passed}} |cyes=110 |cno=65 |cabs=13 |senats={{passed}} |syes=5 |...") |
Glüc da Dhi (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
'''WHEREAS''' while the hit television situation comedy Happy Days was in fact set in the immediate vicinity of the Greater Talossan Area, it depicts Cestoûr culture of the 1950s rather than Talossan or proto-Talossan culture; and | '''WHEREAS''' while the hit television situation comedy Happy Days was in fact set in the immediate vicinity of the Greater Talossan Area, it depicts Cestoûr culture of the 1950s rather than Talossan or proto-Talossan culture; and | ||
'''WHEREAS''' we are not Arthur Fonzarelli and "cool" is nowhere defined as a Talossan virtue, and | '''WHEREAS''' we are not Arthur Fonzarelli and "cool" is nowhere defined as a Talossan virtue, and | ||
'''WHEREAS''' if it were, I would be wearing a bitchin' leather jacket; and | '''WHEREAS''' if it were, I would be wearing a bitchin' leather jacket; and | ||
'''WHEREAS''' in the same sense as the previous Cosâ decided that encouragements and suggestions were not appropriate for law, the same should be said for "cool"; | '''WHEREAS''' in the same sense as the previous Cosâ decided that encouragements and suggestions were not appropriate for law, the same should be said for "cool"; | ||