Template talk:ScribeMiss: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This template seems handy, but one problem with it is that when looking at the list of statutes there will no longer be any indication of which ones have missing text. One can look at the missing laws category, but that is not organized by Clark, which makes it not so useful for figuring out where to look for the missing text. Thoughts? [[User:Siervicul|Siervicul]] ([[User talk:Siervicul|talk]]) | This template seems handy, but one problem with it is that when looking at the list of statutes there will no longer be any indication of which ones have missing text. One can look at the missing laws category, but that is not organized by Clark, which makes it not so useful for figuring out where to look for the missing text. Thoughts? [[User:Siervicul|Siervicul]] ([[User talk:Siervicul|talk]]) | ||
:Almost all of those are from a single period. I left the template off of the ones that are elsewhere.--[[User:AD|AD]] ([[User talk:AD|talk]]) 18:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:46, 18 January 2014
Missing Laws/Acts
I'll get to creating those numbering redirects for these missing laws sometime tomorrow. Love the template! :) Dien (talk) 04:14, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
This template seems handy, but one problem with it is that when looking at the list of statutes there will no longer be any indication of which ones have missing text. One can look at the missing laws category, but that is not organized by Clark, which makes it not so useful for figuring out where to look for the missing text. Thoughts? Siervicul (talk)