Law:50PD5 The Amendments to the Midterm Referendum PD Prime Dictate: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ScribeNote|note=A [https://talossa.proboards.com/thread/12181/petition-writ-mandamus-cjantscheir-chancery lawsuit] regarding this PD brought by [[Litz Cjantscheir]] against the Chancery did not proceed beyond the Government's response to the initial petition, because of [[50PD6]]. Read more [[July 2017 Midterm Referendum|here]].}} | |||
{{Decree | {{Decree | ||
|number= 50PD5 | |number= 50PD5 | ||
Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
|signlink= https://talossa.proboards.com/thread/12155/midterm-referendum-amendments-pd-50pd05 | |signlink= https://talossa.proboards.com/thread/12155/midterm-referendum-amendments-pd-50pd05 | ||
|chancery= [[Law:Digest of Laws|L'Annuntzia dels Legeux]] | |chancery= [[Law:Digest of Laws|L'Annuntzia dels Legeux]] | ||
| | |repealed=y | ||
|law1= 50PD6 | |law1= 50PD6 | ||
|Damm= y | |Damm= y | ||
Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
'''THEREFORE''' to allow an early referendum to take place, since it contains provisions that apply to the next scheduled General Election, 50RZ14's THEREFORE is amended to read: | '''THEREFORE''' to allow an early referendum to take place, since it contains provisions that apply to the next scheduled General Election, 50RZ14's THEREFORE is amended to read: | ||
:'' '''THEREFORE''' the Ziu, pursuant to Article XX of the Organic Law, hereby instructs the Chancery to administer the following non-binding referendum to the People of Talossa: | <blockquote>:'' '''THEREFORE''' the Ziu, pursuant to Article XX of the Organic Law, hereby instructs the Chancery to administer the following non-binding referendum to the People of Talossa: | ||
:''(1) Do you think that Talossa should continue to be a monarchy? Yes___ No___ | :''(1) Do you think that Talossa should continue to be a monarchy? Yes___ No___ | ||
:''(2) Notwithstanding the prior question, do you think that the Crown should have no political power in any form, and function only as a figurehead? Yes___ No____ | :''(2) Notwithstanding the prior question, do you think that the Crown should have no political power in any form, and function only as a figurehead? Yes___ No____</blockquote> | ||
and the FURTHER section is struck in its entirety. | and the FURTHER section is struck in its entirety. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:03, 9 April 2023
Scribe note |
A lawsuit regarding this PD brought by Litz Cjantscheir against the Chancery did not proceed beyond the Government's response to the initial petition, because of 50PD6. Read more here. |